<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33849608</id><updated>2009-06-22T09:44:57.857-05:00</updated><title type='text'>DNSBL Resource - All About Blacklists</title><subtitle type='html'>Information and commentary about spam blacklists.</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.dnsbl.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.dnsbl.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25'/><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>56</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33849608.post-4818651446801733263</id><published>2009-06-22T09:38:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2009-06-22T09:44:57.867-05:00</updated><title type='text'>SORBS Status: Shutting Down or For Sale</title><summary type='text'>As reported on Spamtacular and on SORBS' website:"ANNOUNCEMENT: Possible SORBS Closure...                                                                                                                                It comes with great sadness that I have to announce the imminent closure of SORBS. The University of Queensland have decided not to honor their agreement with myself and SORBS and </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/4818651446801733263'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/4818651446801733263'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.dnsbl.com/2009/06/sorbs-status-shutting-down-or-for-sale.html' title='SORBS Status: Shutting Down or For Sale'/><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='06827555012735028969'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33849608.post-9212900480609933505</id><published>2009-04-29T11:17:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-04-29T11:20:59.635-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Status of dnsbl.net.au: Dead</title><summary type='text'>The blacklist at dnsbl.net.au has announced it is winding down. As noted in a February 25, 2009 posting on its website, "Please note that as of Wednesday, April 1, 2009 the DNSBL.NET.AU blacklist will cease to exist."As of this writing on April 29th, 2009, I do still see active entries when querying via DNS, but I assume that these are likely to go away soon. If you utilize this blacklist, I'd </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/9212900480609933505'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/9212900480609933505'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.dnsbl.com/2009/04/status-of-dnsblnetau-dead.html' title='Status of dnsbl.net.au: Dead'/><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='06827555012735028969'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33849608.post-5402258486962516012</id><published>2009-03-31T10:54:00.005-05:00</published><updated>2009-03-31T11:03:58.350-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='dnsbl'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='dsbl'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='dead dnsbls'/><title type='text'>Status of DSBL: Dead</title><summary type='text'>The DNSBL called "DSBL" is no more. As of March 11, 209, their website reports: "DSBL is GONE and highly unlikely to return. Please remove it from your mail server configuration."DSBL was an open relay/open proxy DNSBL. From the website: "DSBL relied on volunteers who, upon receiving spam, would test the IP addresses that sent them spam for open relay and open proxy vulnerabilities.  "The tests </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/5402258486962516012'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/5402258486962516012'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.dnsbl.com/2009/03/status-of-dsbl-dead.html' title='Status of DSBL: Dead'/><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='06827555012735028969'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33849608.post-9046286283849386741</id><published>2008-10-06T10:26:00.006-05:00</published><updated>2008-10-07T14:03:11.397-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='dnsbl'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='bcp'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='dead dnsbls'/><title type='text'>Shutting Down Blacklists</title><summary type='text'>As I often do, today I'm receiving reports about a DNSBL (which I've previously warned was dead) is returning false positive entries for those still using it today.What does this mean?IF YOU ARE AN EMAIL ADMINISTRATOR WHO USES BLACKLISTS, you need to start paying attention. Blacklists are not "set it and forget it." Instead, you should periodically check the blacklists you're using. Ensure they </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/9046286283849386741'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/9046286283849386741'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.dnsbl.com/2008/10/shutting-down-blacklists.html' title='Shutting Down Blacklists'/><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='06827555012735028969'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33849608.post-4677213500576689397</id><published>2008-08-17T16:07:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2008-08-17T16:10:01.668-05:00</updated><title type='text'>DNSBL Stats Update</title><summary type='text'>I haven't posted DNSBL stats for a while now; the server it was on crashed. Thankfully, all the data was recovered, and I have it right here with me. I just haven't had the time to get everything up and alive again on my new server quite yet. The good thing is, I do have a new server, and plenty of bandwidth to deal with the rigmarole of parsing many tens of thousands of spams a day (which is </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/4677213500576689397'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/4677213500576689397'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.dnsbl.com/2008/08/dnsbl-stats-update.html' title='DNSBL Stats Update'/><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='06827555012735028969'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33849608.post-8138483392811586369</id><published>2008-07-23T13:28:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-07-23T13:29:12.294-05:00</updated><title type='text'>DNSBL Stats Not Updating</title><summary type='text'>Just wanted to let everybody know that I'm aware that the DNSBL stats are not currently updating. The server this process runs on has crashed. I'll be restoring the data to a new server sometime in the near future.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/8138483392811586369'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/8138483392811586369'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.dnsbl.com/2008/07/dnsbl-stats-not-updating.html' title='DNSBL Stats Not Updating'/><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='06827555012735028969'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33849608.post-6831630481742662484</id><published>2008-05-26T13:19:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-05-26T13:20:42.488-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Security Sage Update</title><summary type='text'>It seems today as though the Security Sage domains have expired and/or replaced by "placeholder" pages by their registrar. Net result: Bad things. If you were still using their BL, you're probably having problems receiving inbound mail right about now.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/6831630481742662484'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/6831630481742662484'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.dnsbl.com/2008/05/security-sage-update.html' title='Security Sage Update'/><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='06827555012735028969'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33849608.post-4803219029406310456</id><published>2008-05-20T10:06:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2008-05-20T11:08:26.568-05:00</updated><title type='text'>DSBL Current Status: DOWN</title><summary type='text'>DSBL, the Distributed Sender Blackhole List, seems to have gone missing. The list appears to have been in operation since at least May, 2002.The website at www.dsbl.org is not currently responding. Their mail server specified in their MX record is non-responsive, and any DNS mirrors still responding seem to be hosting an out-of-date copy of the blacklist's zone data.I've talked to the maintainer.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/4803219029406310456'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/4803219029406310456'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.dnsbl.com/2008/05/dsbl-dead-broken.html' title='DSBL Current Status: DOWN'/><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='06827555012735028969'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33849608.post-8671111072127125855</id><published>2008-03-26T10:51:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2008-03-26T10:56:31.352-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Help, we're listed on ORDB!</title><summary type='text'>I've received multiple queries about this today, so I figured it would be wise to put up a quick message about this.ORDB is a long dead blacklist, gone for more than a year.Recently, they started "listing the world" -- meaning everybody using ORDB is now blocking 100% of inbound mail. Blacklists do this to shed themselves of any excess DNS query traffic from sites who haven't yet ceased querying </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/8671111072127125855'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/8671111072127125855'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.dnsbl.com/2008/03/help-were-listed-on-ordb.html' title='Help, we&apos;re listed on ORDB!'/><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='06827555012735028969'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33849608.post-6207759679716061842</id><published>2007-11-19T17:03:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2007-11-19T17:05:22.734-06:00</updated><title type='text'>False Positives</title><summary type='text'>One of the things I measure over at the Blacklist Statistics Center is false positives. What are false positives? How do I use the term, exactly?  Ultimately, there are three different ways to define false positives, depending on whom you ask and who they are. Allow me to explain.Here's what I think of as a false positive(1) in the context of DNSBLs: You did not receive a mail message you signed </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/6207759679716061842'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/6207759679716061842'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.dnsbl.com/2007/11/false-positives.html' title='False Positives'/><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='06827555012735028969'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33849608.post-2490303848396065244</id><published>2007-11-10T17:53:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2007-11-10T17:54:00.780-06:00</updated><title type='text'>The Union of UCEPROTECT</title><summary type='text'>The folks behind UCEPROTECT asked me what it would look like if I were using all three UCEPROTECT backlist zones together. I thought it was a neat idea and decided to share the results publicly. Click here to take a look.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/2490303848396065244'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/2490303848396065244'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.dnsbl.com/2007/11/union-of-uceprotect.html' title='The Union of UCEPROTECT'/><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='06827555012735028969'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33849608.post-751511883150878224</id><published>2007-11-10T17:27:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2007-11-10T17:43:48.606-06:00</updated><title type='text'>Spam &amp; Ham: Overview &amp; FAQ</title><summary type='text'>A lot of people have asked how the spam and ham (non-spam) data is compiled for the Blacklist Statistics Center here at DNSBL Resource. Where does it come from? What senders does it represent? Here's an updated overview of what goes in to the spam and ham (non-spam) feeds here at DNSBL Resource.On the spam side of things, the input comes from a series of spamtrap domains and email addresses.  </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/751511883150878224'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/751511883150878224'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.dnsbl.com/2007/11/spam-versus-ham-breakdown.html' title='Spam &amp; Ham: Overview &amp; FAQ'/><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='06827555012735028969'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33849608.post-5181342947995495529</id><published>2007-11-03T10:35:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-11-03T16:21:18.645-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Status of bl.csma.biz: ALIVE</title><summary type='text'>McFadden Associates has been publishing two different, spamtrap-driven DNSBL zones since October 2003.A primary zone, bl.csma.biz, containing only aggressive hosts that have spammed repeatedly during a short (recent) timeframe.An additional zone, sbl.csma.biz, with more aggressive listing criteria. It lists hosts that have generated spam within a 45-day period. They recommend that this one not be</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/5181342947995495529'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/5181342947995495529'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.dnsbl.com/2007/11/status-of-blcsmabiz-dead.html' title='Status of bl.csma.biz: ALIVE'/><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='06827555012735028969'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33849608.post-6319153026779506823</id><published>2007-11-03T10:16:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-11-03T10:35:12.316-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Status of rbl.spamhaus.org: NOT A BLACKLIST</title><summary type='text'>My friend Mickey Chandler pointed out recently that he's been seeing some unusual bounces that look like this:Host blacklisted - Found on Realtime Black List server  blocklist.address.is.wrong.spamhaus.orgIt turns out that you block all of your inbound mail with an error like this if you configure "rbl.spamhaus.org" in your mail server as a DNSBL zone for blocking purposes.Why? Because there is </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/6319153026779506823'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/6319153026779506823'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.dnsbl.com/2007/11/status-of-rblspamhausorg-not-blacklist.html' title='Status of rbl.spamhaus.org: NOT A BLACKLIST'/><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='06827555012735028969'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33849608.post-712502515383821558</id><published>2007-10-26T15:30:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2008-05-26T13:19:31.247-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Status of blackhole.securitysage.com: DOWN</title><summary type='text'>The RHSBL (right hand side blacklist) blackhole.securitysage.com appears to have been created by Jeffrey Posluns and appears to have been around since at least August, 2004.I received a report today indicating that a mail administrator has been unable to reliably query the blackhole.securitysage.com blacklist zone. With the help of my friends, I was able to confirm this issue.It looks to be a DNS</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/712502515383821558'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/712502515383821558'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.dnsbl.com/2007/10/status-of-blackholesecuritysagecom-down.html' title='Status of blackhole.securitysage.com: DOWN'/><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='06827555012735028969'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33849608.post-3441733766224853068</id><published>2007-10-18T16:19:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-10-18T16:20:59.040-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Expanded Spamtraps and Hamtraps</title><summary type='text'>As always, I'm looking to maintain and improve the accuracy of the data behind the reports over at the Blacklist Statistics Center here at DNSBL Resource. Here's a quick overview of a couple of recent improvements I've made.  Just this week, I've turned up an additional spamtrap feed. This data is based on a set of domains that were no longer routed, but are found on many spammer lists. Not sure </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/3441733766224853068'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/3441733766224853068'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.dnsbl.com/2007/10/expanded-spamtraps-and-hamtraps.html' title='Expanded Spamtraps and Hamtraps'/><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='06827555012735028969'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33849608.post-1434406294056656516</id><published>2007-10-14T16:56:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-10-14T17:09:01.322-05:00</updated><title type='text'>PSBL: Easy On, Easy Off</title><summary type='text'>The Passive Spam Block List, or PSBL (psbl.surriel.com) is a spamtrap-driven anti-spam blacklist that has been around since at least June, 2003. Created by Rik van Riel, who explains on the PSBL website that “the idea is that 99% of the hosts that send me spam never send me legitimate email, but that people whose mail server was used by spammers should still be able to send me email."The passive </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/1434406294056656516'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/1434406294056656516'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.dnsbl.com/2007/10/psbl-easy-on-easy-off.html' title='PSBL: Easy On, Easy Off'/><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='06827555012735028969'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33849608.post-8765214375456841392</id><published>2007-10-13T13:53:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-10-13T14:37:04.600-05:00</updated><title type='text'>The Fiveten Blacklist: Not Accurate</title><summary type='text'>“Fiveten” (blackholes.five-ten-sg.com) is a combination anti-spam blacklist run by Carl Byington, publishing under the name of “510 Software Group.” This blacklist has been available since at least February, 2001.  It has a multitude of criteria for listings. As of this writing, the website lists the following current criteria:Individual spam sources: “These are generally taken from spam samples </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/8765214375456841392'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/8765214375456841392'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.dnsbl.com/2007/10/fiveten-blacklist-not-accurate.html' title='The Fiveten Blacklist: Not Accurate'/><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='06827555012735028969'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33849608.post-6554421337682581148</id><published>2007-10-12T12:35:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-10-14T17:40:04.866-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Spamhaus ZEN: The DNSBL Resource Review</title><summary type='text'>Spamhaus ZEN is a composite blacklist run by the Spamhaus Project. This UK-based organization was created in 1998 by Steve Linford, and is maintained by a group of employees spread across the globe.Spamhaus runs a number of different spam-blocking lists. These include: SBL  (Spamhaus Block List), which aims to block verified spam sources,  spam gangs, and supporters of spam. This list is manually</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/6554421337682581148'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/6554421337682581148'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.dnsbl.com/2007/10/spamhaus-zen.html' title='Spamhaus ZEN: The DNSBL Resource Review'/><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='06827555012735028969'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33849608.post-6043410963596000491</id><published>2007-09-29T22:44:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-09-30T14:04:44.702-05:00</updated><title type='text'>New: Blacklist Statistics Center</title><summary type='text'>Please take a moment to check out the new DNSBL Resource Blacklist Statistics Center. Replacing the old DNSBL stats page, this new section of DNSBL Resource provides week-by-week graphs for twenty different blacklists. At a glance, one can easily see the accuracy rates and false positive rates for the past thirteen weeks for any blacklist in the system. This data will be refreshed weekly, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/6043410963596000491'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/6043410963596000491'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.dnsbl.com/2007/09/new-blacklist-statistics-center.html' title='New: Blacklist Statistics Center'/><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='06827555012735028969'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33849608.post-7400848572197091706</id><published>2007-09-24T10:50:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-09-30T14:31:37.175-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Status of completewhois.com: IN FLUX</title><summary type='text'>Update 9/30/2007: The website www.completewhois.com is operational again, but some links appear to be broken. My attempts to query their DNSBLs have all timed out. While CompleteWhois may be on the mend, it seems that it may be too soon to give the all clear.Previous updates below:This post in the newsgroup news.admin.net-abuse.email, and my own testing both confirm that any DNSBLs running under </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/7400848572197091706'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/7400848572197091706'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.dnsbl.com/2007/09/status-of-completewhoiscom-dead.html' title='Status of completewhois.com: IN FLUX'/><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='06827555012735028969'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33849608.post-1031609805169974980</id><published>2007-09-03T23:09:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2007-09-03T23:32:23.040-05:00</updated><title type='text'>APEWS: Doing the Math</title><summary type='text'>I'm guilty. I admit it. I've called APEWS listings "random," which isn't quite right. Arbitrary would be a better word for it. Not to mention broad, and questionable.APEWS, the "anonymous" blacklist meant to be an early warning system for spam, generates a lot of worry from administrators and end users who find themselves listed by way of plugging their IP address into an online lookup tools like</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/1031609805169974980'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/1031609805169974980'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.dnsbl.com/2007/09/apews-doing-math.html' title='APEWS: Doing the Math'/><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='06827555012735028969'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33849608.post-2024620579830506433</id><published>2007-08-13T18:52:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-08-13T18:54:12.444-05:00</updated><title type='text'>What to do if you are listed on APEWS</title><summary type='text'>If you are listed on the APEWS blacklist, as confirmed by checking their website, here's how I would recommend that you handle the situation. (Who the heck am I?)  Note: This isn’t guidance on how to avoid a blacklisting or sidestep anti-spam groups. If you have a spam issue, fix it. Don't spam, ever, for any reason. This is information is regarding how to address an issue with a blacklist that </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/2024620579830506433'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/2024620579830506433'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.dnsbl.com/2007/08/what-to-do-if-you-are-listed-on-apews.html' title='What to do if you are listed on APEWS'/><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='06827555012735028969'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33849608.post-9213847907253465403</id><published>2007-08-11T12:38:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2007-09-03T23:34:08.974-05:00</updated><title type='text'>APEWS News and Commentary Roundup</title><summary type='text'>APEWS, the Anonymous Postmasters Early Warning System, is an “anonymous” blacklist that claims to run in the style of SPEWS. That is to say, its goal is to be an “early warning system,” catching and stopping spam before other blacklists or filters have the opportunity to do so.  The APEWS blacklist was first announced by way of an anonymous posting to the newsgroup </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/9213847907253465403'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/9213847907253465403'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.dnsbl.com/2007/08/apews-news-and-commentary-roundup.html' title='APEWS News and Commentary Roundup'/><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='06827555012735028969'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33849608.post-2785186385150080907</id><published>2007-07-20T18:03:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-04-08T16:31:48.120-05:00</updated><title type='text'>SORBS: Accuracy Rates and False Positives</title><summary type='text'>The blacklist SORBS (aka the “Spam and Open Relay Blocking System”) was created in 2002 by Australian Matthew Sullivan. SORBS publishes a main “aggregate zone” (dnsbl.sorbs.net) containing listings meeting a multitude of criteria beyond open relaying mail services. SORBS also publishes multiple other zones meeting various criteria.  As related previously, SORBS appears to be undergoing changes. </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/2785186385150080907'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33849608/posts/default/2785186385150080907'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.dnsbl.com/2007/07/sorbs-on-accuracy-rates-and-false.html' title='SORBS: Accuracy Rates and False Positives'/><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='06827555012735028969'/></author></entry></feed>