Status of relays.orbs.org: Shut down, legal troubles in 2001

Remember ORBS? Short for “Open Relay Behavior Modification System,” it was a blacklist run by Alan Brown from New Zealand. (It was ORBS Mark II, the first version having been run by Canadian Alan Hodgson.)

People keep asking me about the situation regarding ORBS and its eventual downfall. It happened so long ago, that I don't feel that it would be appropriate to try to fill people in from memory alone. Instead, here's links to a lot of the articles I've found regarding Alan Brown and ORBS. If you have any others, drop me a line and I'll add them to this page.

• Wikipedia's page on ORBS.

• Thread from the newsgroup nz.comp that discusses the shutdown and contains opinions regarding ORBS' listing policies.

• Here's an overview of legal action against Alan Brown, I believe around the same times as ORBS was imploding. Apparently he was sued for defamation over this newsgroup post, and lost. (More commentary on that here, from someone else involved, writing about it a couple of years after the fact.)

• This Register article talks about the legal action against Alan Brown and ORBS regarding Alan's blacklisting of Xtra and Actrix. Courts found that they were falsely listed on the ORBS blacklist.

• An Actrix rep points out that the reason they were listed is due to getting sucked into the disagreement between Alan Brown and Domainz Followups from others indicate that the Actrix IP address was listed as an open relay input. According to Actrix, it was not an open relay.

• Some newsgroup commentary regarding the defamation suit and ORBS listing policies.

• Tom Betz posts Alan Brown's statement to SPAM-L encouraging the blocking of Telecom NZ and indicating that he's no longer in New Zealand.

• Here's an interesting article about ORBS and the controversy surrounding its practices, from Salon.com.

Please note that I'm not linking to any commentary or conspiracy theories put forth by emotional, anti-blacklisting “how dare you block my guaranteed opt-in email” people. There are many blacklists run correctly and appropriately. There were then, and there are now. Blacklists themselves weren't the problem, and aren't the problem now. Like with any other field of study, type of product, or process, some manage it well, and others do not.

Status of rbl.cluecentral.net: ALIVE

The DNSBL “rbl.cluecentral.net” has been revived. Its maintainer, Sabri Berisha, had previously shut it down in November 2005.

This list aims to allow you to whitelist or blacklist mail from specific countries, or from certain routers (by AS number).

For example, if you wish to block all mail from the US, you could configure us.rbl.cluecentral.net as a DNSBL to be used for mail blocking in your email server software, and you would then block all mail from the US, as identified by Sabri’s categorization.

For more information, see Sabri’s post to the NANOG mailing list, announcing resuscitation of the list, or click here visit the list’s website.

Note that while these lists may be used to block spam, they're not exactly spam-blocking lists. Rejecting all mail from China simply means that you're going to reject all mail from China, spam or non-spam. It's up to you to determine whether or not this is an acceptable compromise. I assume, like with users of korea.services.net, administrators who choose to use this list are fed up with spam from a certain country's servers, and receive little enough legitimate mail from a country that the risk of false positives is considered acceptable.